Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video177.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalia Lafourcade results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 202.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 177.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (23,897 of 26,780 speakers). This Natalia Lafourcade is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Natalia Lafourcade
Speaker details
Total words: 177.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos177.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 4.1%4.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos