Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nara Organics results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 178.904 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (17,869 of 26,780 speakers). This Nara Organics is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Nara Organics
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
21.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.2%41.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos