Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video123.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naomi Gleit results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 71% saturation with 106.783 hits. Analysis detected 333.741 faulty-reasoning hits from 123.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,721 of 28,364 speakers). This Naomi Gleit is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Naomi Gleit
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 123.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
30.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos123.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 71.0%71.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 71.0%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos