Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Armour results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Genetic Fallacy, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 200 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,908 of 28,364 speakers). This Nancy Armour is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Nancy Armour
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos