Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos129.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naima DeBrest results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 84.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,609 of 28,364 speakers). This Naima DeBrest is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Naima DeBrest
Speaker details
Total words: 129.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
33.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos129.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.9%24.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos