Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nadine Seiler results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 71.2% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 120.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,193 of 28,364 speakers). This Nadine Seiler is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Nadine Seiler
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
38.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 71.2%71.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.2%21.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 71.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos