Speaker summary
⁠57%4 analyzed articles/videos210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NAACP results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 589.673 faulty-reasoning hits from 210 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,674 of 28,364 speakers). This NAACP is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
NAACP
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
17.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos210 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.3%35.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos