Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mozilla results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,476 of 28,364 speakers). This Mozilla is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Mozilla
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos