Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MotorBiscuit results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,876 of 28,364 speakers). This MotorBiscuit is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
MotorBiscuit
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos