Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video90.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morten Boesen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Status Quo Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 139.563 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,942 of 28,364 speakers). This Morten Boesen is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Morten Boesen
Speaker details
Total words: 90.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
16.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos90.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos