Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monserrat Cardoso results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,468 of 28,364 speakers). This Monserrat Cardoso is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Monserrat Cardoso
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠67%Monserrat Cardoso (selected)50%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos