Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video37.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Zimmerman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Begging the Question, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 199.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,795 of 28,364 speakers). This Monica Zimmerman is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Monica Zimmerman
Speaker details
Total words: 37.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
70.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos