Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly Fitzpatrick results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 101 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,884 of 28,364 speakers). This Molly Fitzpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Molly Fitzpatrick
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos