Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mollie Engelhart results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 357.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,464 of 28,364 speakers). This Mollie Engelhart is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Mollie Engelhart
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
34.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 58.7%58.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 58.7%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos