Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moises Rodrigues results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Nature, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 81.952 hits. Analysis detected 311.952 faulty-reasoning hits from 155 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,588 of 28,364 speakers). This Moises Rodrigues is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Moises Rodrigues
Speaker details
Total words: 155
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.9% percentile
19.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos155 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.2%42.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.2%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos