Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed Abdul Salam results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Quote-first Misdirection, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.6% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 592.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,522 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohammed Abdul Salam is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Mohammed Abdul Salam
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠60%Mohammed Abdul Salam (selected)42%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 123
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
41.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 64.6%64.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 64.6%64.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 32.3%32.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.3%32.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 32.3%32.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.3%32.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 64.6%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 64.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 6.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos