Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Reza Sharifi results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64.5 hits. Analysis detected 236.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,861 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohammad Reza Sharifi is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Mohammad Reza Sharifi
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos