Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohamed Attia results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 24.75 hits. Analysis detected 110.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,777 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohamed Attia is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Mohamed Attia
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
27.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 45.8%45.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 45.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos