Speaker summary
41% 5 analyzed articles/videos 232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MoDOT results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 83 hits . Analysis detected 473 faulty-reasoning hits from 232 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,213 of 28,364 speakers). This MoDOT is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. MoDOT
Speaker details
Total words: 232
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 8.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos232 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst