Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miwa Kobari results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 70.9% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 247 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,148 of 28,364 speakers). This Miwa Kobari is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Miwa Kobari
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
29.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 70.9%70.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 70.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos