Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitch Lansky results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 61.875 hits. Analysis detected 263.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,403 of 28,364 speakers). This Mitch Lansky is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Mitch Lansky
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 94.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
42.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 77.5%77.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 77.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos