Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Budget Project results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Genetic Fallacy, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,757 of 28,364 speakers). This Missouri Budget Project is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Missouri Budget Project
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos