Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam Vogel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,616.984 faulty-reasoning hits from 813 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,071 of 28,364 speakers). This Miriam Vogel is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Miriam Vogel
Speaker details
Total words: 813
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos813 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.6%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos