Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video2,143.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miranda Bogen results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,880.668 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,143.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,193 of 28,364 speakers). This Miranda Bogen is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Miranda Bogen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠1%Miranda Bogen (selected)3%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 2,143.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos