Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos59 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mira results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 74.6% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 74.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,645 of 28,364 speakers). This Mira is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Mira
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.1% percentile
74.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos59 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 74.6%74.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 74.6%74.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 74.6%74.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 74.6%74.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 74.6%74.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 74.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 74.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 74.6%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 74.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 74.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos