Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ministry of Health in Gaza results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 87.3% saturation with 74.625 hits. Analysis detected 425.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,962 of 28,364 speakers). This Ministry of Health in Gaza is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Ministry of Health in Gaza
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
52.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 87.3%87.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.1%49.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 49.6%49.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 87.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 49.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos