Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video109.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milton Love results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 309.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,090 of 28,364 speakers). This Milton Love is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Milton Love
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 109.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
22.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos109.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos