Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miles Wang results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,920 of 28,364 speakers). This Miles Wang is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Miles Wang
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
32.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.1%35.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Burden of Proof: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos