Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video95 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikie Sherrill (D) results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 62.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 257 faulty-reasoning hits from 95 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,507 of 28,364 speakers). This Mikie Sherrill (D) is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Mikie Sherrill (D)
Speaker details
Total words: 95
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos95 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 62.1%62.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 62.1%62.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 62.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 7.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos