Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikel Merino results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,803 of 28,364 speakers). This Mikel Merino is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Mikel Merino
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos