Speaker summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos244.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Miller results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 635 faulty-reasoning hits from 244.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,231 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Miller is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Mike Miller
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 244.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
13.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos244.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.3%4.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos