Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos41.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike McCloud results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 186 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.667 analyzed words across 2 videos, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,531 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike McCloud is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Mike McCloud
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 41.667
Video count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
25.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos41.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 52.9%52.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos