Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video158.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Longoria results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 202.934 faulty-reasoning hits from 158.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,941 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Longoria is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Mike Longoria
Speaker details
Total words: 158.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos158.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos