Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Faulk results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 34.875 hits. Analysis detected 158.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,678 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Faulk is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Mike Faulk
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 41.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
55.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos41.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos