Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Cassio results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 585.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 171 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,793 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Cassio is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Mike Cassio
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 171
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
19.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos171 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 48.9%48.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 46.5%46.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos