Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikaela Shiffrin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,797 of 28,364 speakers). This Mikaela Shiffrin is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Mikaela Shiffrin
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

CBC | Skiing News⁠4%
CBC⁠49%7/23/2026, 7:47:36 PM