Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video99.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mika Rizki Puspaningrum results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 62.5% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 99.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (13,033 of 28,364 speakers). This Mika Rizki Puspaningrum is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Mika Rizki Puspaningrum
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠55%Mika Rizki Puspaningrum (selected)36%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 99.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
35.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos99.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 62.5%62.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 62.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos