Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miisa Kaivos results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,376 of 28,364 speakers). This Miisa Kaivos is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Miisa Kaivos
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
19.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos