Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miiko Paasi results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 52.875 hits. Analysis detected 99.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,753 of 28,364 speakers). This Miiko Paasi is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Miiko Paasi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos