Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miguel Arambula results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 412.934 faulty-reasoning hits from 342 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (24,303 of 26,943 speakers). This Miguel Arambula is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Miguel Arambula
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠10%Miguel Arambula (selected)10%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 342
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.8% percentile
9.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos342 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos