Speaker summary
ā 45%1 analyzed article/video29.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Lee results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 29.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ā 77% (6,713 of 28,165 speakers). This Michelle Lee is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Michelle Lee
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 77%Michelle Lee (selected)63%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 29.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos29.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos