Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video87 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Dahl results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 38.25 hits. Analysis detected 117.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 87 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,715 of 28,364 speakers). This Michelle Dahl is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Michelle Dahl
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠38%Michelle Dahl (selected)24%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 87
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.5% percentile
23.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos87 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos