Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video245 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michele Cantara results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 661.81 faulty-reasoning hits from 245 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,910 of 28,364 speakers). This Michele Cantara is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Michele Cantara
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠20%Michele Cantara (selected)14%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 245
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos245 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.6%52.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.9%8.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos