Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video72.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Ouweleen results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.8% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 322.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 72.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,811 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Ouweleen is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Michael Ouweleen
Speaker details
Total words: 72.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
53.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos72.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 77.8%77.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 81.8%81.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.8%77.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 48.9%48.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.9%38.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.9%38.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 81.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 77.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos