Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Mulcahy results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 179.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,677 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Mulcahy is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Michael Mulcahy
Speaker details
Total words: 52.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
55.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos