Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Metcalfe results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 70% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 185.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,401 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Metcalfe is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Michael Metcalfe
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
42.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 70.0%70.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 70.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos