Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Manley results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 61.875 hits. Analysis detected 336.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,713 of 28,012 speakers). This Michael Manley is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Michael Manley
Speaker details
Total words: 82.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
54.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos