Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael LiPetri results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Overconfidence Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,239 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael LiPetri is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Michael LiPetri
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.0% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos