Speaker summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 118.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Ilardi results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 71.5% saturation with 113 hits . Analysis detected 307.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 118.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (17,456 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Ilardi is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Michael Ilardi
Speaker details
Total words: 118.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 23.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos118.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 71.5% 71.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 27.9% 27.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Anecdotal: Speaker 71.5%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst