Speaker summary
⁠59%3 analyzed articles/videos160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Dresdner results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Composition/Division, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 62.7% saturation with 112.875 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 160 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (17,803 of 26,349 speakers). This Michael Dresdner is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Michael Dresdner
Speaker details
Total words: 160
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.4% percentile
20.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos160 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 62.7%62.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 62.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos